If you don’t know what Bitcoin is, then Do a bit of research on the internet, and you’ll get lots… but the brief Narrative is that Bitcoin was created as a medium of trade, with no central bank Or bank of issue being involved. Furthermore, Bitcoin transactions are supposed To be personal, anonymous. Most significantly, Bitcoins have no real World existence; they exist only in computer applications, as a kind of virtual reality.
The general Notion is that Bitcoins Are ‘mined’… intriguing expression here… by solving a difficult mathematical formula -harder as more Bitcoins are ‘mined’ into existence; yet again intriguing- on a computer. Once created, the new Bitcoin is put into a digital ‘wallet’. It’s then possible to exchange real goods or Fiat money for Bitcoins… and vice versa. Furthermore, as there’s not any central issuer of Bitcoins, it’s all highly dispersed, hence resistant to being ‘managed’ by authority.
Naturally proponents of Bitcoin, Those who profit from the development of Bitcoin, insist fairly loudly that ‘for certain, Bitcoin is money’… and not just that, but ‘it is the best money ever, the money of the future’, etc.. . Well, the proponents of all Fiat shout as loudly that paper currency is money… and we all know that Fiat paper is not cash by any means, as it lacks the most important attributes of real money. The issue then is does Bitcoin even qualify as money… not mind that it being the cash of the future, or the best money .
Compared to Fiat, Bitcoin does not Do too badly as a medium of exchange. Fiat is only accepted in the geographical domain of its issuer. Dollars are no good in Europe etc.. Bitcoin is accepted internationally. On the flip side, not many retailers currently accept payment in Bitcoin. Unless the acceptance grows , Fiat wins… although in the cost of trade between countries.
The first condition is a great deal Tougher; money has to be a stable store of value… now Bitcoins have gone out of a ‘value’ of $3.00 to about $1,000, in just a couple years. This is about as far away from being a ‘stable store of value’; since you can get! Truly, such gains are a perfect example of a speculative boom… like Dutch tulip bulbs, or junior mining companies, or even Nortel stocks. The effects of Bitcoins Wealth Review, not only on you but many others, is a fact that has to be acknowledged. We do recognize very well that your situation is vital and matters a great deal. We will commence the rest of our conversation right away, but sometimes you have to stop and let issues sink in a little bit. This is the sort of content that men and women need to know about, and we have no problems stating that. The last remaining areas for conversation may be even more important.
Naturally, Fiat fails here as well; For instance, the US Dollar, the ‘main’ Fiat, has dropped over 95% of its worth in a couple of decades… neither fiat nor Bitcoin qualify at the most important measure of cash; the capacity to store value and conserve value through time. Real money, which is Gold, has shown the ability to hold value not only for centuries, but for eons. Neither Fiat nor Bitcoin has this critical capacity… both fail as money.
Ultimately, we return to the next Attribute; this of being the numeraire. Now this is actually intriguing, and we can see why the two Bitcoin and Fiat fail as money, by looking closely at the question of the ‘numeraire’. Numeraire describes the usage of money to not only store worth, but to in a way measure, or compare worth. In Austrian economics, it’s considered impossible to really quantify value; after all, value resides only in human consciousness… and how can anything in understanding actually be measured? Nevertheless, through the principle of Mengerian market action, that is interaction between bid and offer, market prices can be established… if just momentarily… and this industry price is expressed in terms of the numeraire, the most marketable good, that is money.
So how do we establish the value of Fiat… ? Through the concept of ‘buying power’… which is, the worth of Fiat is determined by what it can be traded for… a so called ‘basket of goods’. However, his clearly suggests that Fiat has no significance of its own, rather appreciate flows from the worth of their goods and services it might be traded for. Causality flows from the goods ‘bought’ into the Fiat number. After all, what difference is there between a one Dollar bill and a hundred Dollar invoice, except that the amount printed on it… along with the purchasing power of the number?
Gold, on the other hand, is not Quantified by what it deals for; rather, uniquely, it is measured by another physical standard; from its own weight, or mass. A g of Gold is a gram of gold, and an ounce of Gold is an oz of Gold… no matter what amount is engraved on its surface, ‘face value’ or differently. Causality is the opposite to that of Fiat; Gold is measured by weight, an inherent quality… maybe not by purchasing power. Now, have you really any notion of the value of an oz of Dollars? No anything. Fiat is just ‘quantified’ with an ephemeral quantity… the number printed on it, ‘ the ‘face value’.
Bitcoin is further away from being The numeraire; not just is it simply a few, much as Fiat… but its value is measured in Fiat! Even if Bitcoin becomes internationally recognized as a medium of trade, and even if it succeeds to replace the Dollar as the approved ‘numeraire’, it can never possess an intrinsic measure like Gold has. Gold is unique in being measured by a true, unchanging physical quantity. Gold is unique in preserving value for centuries. Nothing else in reach of humankind has this exceptional blend of attributes.